Bypass Surgery or Stenting for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Diabetes

Background

The randomized EXCEL (Evaluation of XIENCE versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left Main Revascularization) trial reported a similar rate of the 3-year composite primary endpoint of death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke in patients with left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) and site-assessed low or intermediate SYNTAX scores treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Whether these results are consistent in high-risk patients with diabetes, who have fared relatively better with CABG in most prior trials, is unknown.

TACE对原发性肝癌患者的疗效及NLR、PLR的影响研究

目的研究经导管动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)对原发性肝癌患者的疗效及中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞计数比(NLR)、血小板/淋巴细胞计数比(PLR)的影响。方法选择2015年6月～2019年1月我院接诊的原发性肝癌患者80例作为研究对象,采用随机数表法将患者分为两组,每组各40例。对照组予传统肝切除术治疗,观察组采用TACE治疗。对比两组治疗后的临床效果,NLR、PLR、癌胚抗原(CEA)、可溶性B7-H4、可溶性白细胞介素-2受体(sIL-2R)及并发症发生情况。结果治疗后,两组患者的总有效率分别为75.00%和52.50%,观察组高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);治疗前,两组患者NLR、PLR水平对比,差异无统计学意义(P0.05);治疗后,患者NLR、PLR水平下降,观察组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);治疗前,两组患者CEA、B7-H4、sIL-2R水平对比,差异无统计学意义(P0.05);治疗后,两组患者CEA、B7-H4、sIL-2R水平下降,观察组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);两组患者并发症发生率分别为17.50%、40.00%,观察组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论在原发性肝癌患者中使用TACE效果显著,可有效改善患者肿瘤标志物水平,减少并发症,值得推广应用。     

The Comprehensive Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of CalliSpheres^® Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization in 367 Liver Cancer Patients: A Multiple-Center,Cohort Study

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy, safety, and prognostic factors of drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) in treating Chinese patients with liver cancer. A total of 367 liver cancer patients from 24 medical centers were consecutively enrolled in this multiple-center, prospective cohort study, including 275 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cases, 37 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) cases, and 55 secondary liver cancer cases. All the patients received CalliSpheres^® DEB-TACE treatment. Treatment response, overall survival (OS), change of liver function, and adverse events (AEs) were assessed. DEB-TACE treatment achieved 19.9% complete response (CR) and 79.6% objective response rate (ORR), with mean OS of 384 days [95% confidence interval (CI): 375–393 days]. CR and ORR were both higher in HCC patients compared with primary ICC patients and secondary liver cancer patients, while no difference was discovered in OS. Portal vein invasion was an independent risk factor for CR, while portal vein invasion, previous conventional TACE (cTACE) treatment, and abnormal blood creatinine (BCr) were independent risk factors for ORR. In addition, largest nodule size 5.0 cm, abnormal albumin (ALB), and abnormal total bilirubin (TBIL) independently correlated with unfavorable OS. Most liver function indexes were recovered to baseline levels at 1–3 months after DEB-TACE. Common AEs were pain, fever, vomiting, and nausea; most of them were at mild grade. CalliSpheres^® DEB-TACE is efficient and well tolerated in Chinese liver cancer patients. Portal vein invasion, previous cTACE treatment, largest nodule size, abnormal BCr, ALB, and TBIL correlate with worse prognosis independently.     

CalliSpheres载药微球TACE联合微波消融治疗原发性大肝癌疗效评价

目的探讨CalliSpheres载药微球经导管肝动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)联合微波消融治疗原发性大肝癌的临床疗效。方法23例直径5~10cm原发性肝癌患者施行了CalliSpheres载药微球TACE联合微波消融治疗。术后1、3、6、9、12个月及以后每3个月采用肝脏增强MRI随访。结果23例患者共行33次CalliSpheres载药微球TACE联合微波消融治疗,无肝脓肿、胆脂瘤等并发症发生。23例患者随访3~22(平均9.2±3.9)个月,术后1、3、6、9、12和15个月客观缓解率分别为86.9%、87%、93.8%、77.0%、63.6%、57.2%,疾病控制率分别为100.0%、95.7%、93.8%、92.3%、81.8%、85.7%。术后3、6、9、12和15个月生存率分别为100%、93.8%、84.6%、81.8%、71.4%。结论CalliSpheres载药微球TACE联合微波消融治疗原发性大肝癌安全可靠,近中期疗效较好。     

Comparison of Opioid Medication Use after Conventional Chemoembolization versus Drug-Eluting Embolic Chemoembolization

PurposeTo assess the use of opioid analgesics and/or antiemetic drugs for pain and nausea following selective chemoembolization with doxorubicin-based conventional (c)-transarterial chemoembolization versus drug-eluting embolic (DEE)-transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Materials and MethodsFrom October 2014 to 2016, 283 patients underwent 393 selective chemoembolization procedures including 188 patients (48%) who underwent c-transarterial chemoembolization and 205 (52%) who underwent DEE-transarterial chemoembolization. Medical records for all patients were retrospectively reviewed. Administration of postprocedural opioid and/or antiemetic agents were collated. Time of administration was stratified as phase 1 recovery (0–6 hours) and observation (6–24 hours). Logistic regression model was used to investigate the relationship of transarterial chemoembolization type and use of intravenous and/or oral analgesic and antiemetic medications while controlling for other clinical variables.ResultsMore patients treated with DEE-transarterial chemoembolization required intravenous analgesia in the observation (6–24 hours) phase (18.5%) than those treated with c-transarterial chemoembolization (10.6%; P = .033). Similar results were noted for oral analgesic agents (50.2% vs. 31.4%, respectively; P < .001) and antiemetics (17.1% vs. 7.5%, respectively; P = .006) during the observation period. Multivariate regression models identified DEE-transarterial chemoembolization as an independent predictor for oral analgesia (odds ratio [OR], 1.84; P = .011), for intravenous and oral analgesia in opioid-naïve patients (OR, 2.46; P = .029) and for antiemetics (OR, 2.56; P = .011).ConclusionsCompared to c-transarterial chemoembolization, DEE-transarterial chemoembolization required greater amounts of opioid analgesic and antiemetic agents 6–24 hours after the procedure. Surgical data indicate that a persistent opioid habit can develop even after minor surgeries, therefore, caution should be exercised, and a regimen of nonopiate pain medications should be considered to reduce postprocedural pain after transarterial chemoembolization.     

富硒酵母与TACE治疗原发性肝癌临床疗效及安全性

目的观察富硒酵母与经肝动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)治疗原发性肝癌的临床疗效并评价其应用安全性。方法选择我院2016年11月～2018年5月收治的89例原发性肝癌患者为本次研究对象,按照患者入院后病床单双号分为单号45例为对照组,双号44例为观察组;对照组采用TACE,观察组在对照组的基础上加富硒酵母口服,2个月后对比两组患者疗效及安全性。结果血硒含量:治疗前两组比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05),观察组治疗后血硒水平明显高于治疗前,与治疗前、对照组治疗后比较,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);血清VEGF水平:治疗前两组差异无统计学意义(P0.05),观察组治疗后明显高于治疗前,差异有统计学意义(P0.05),但与对照组治疗后比较相对较低,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);KPS评分:治疗前两组比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05),治疗后观察组下降幅度低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);两组不良反应情况比较,差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论富硒酵母联合TACE治疗原发性肝癌能够有效改善患者低硒状态,抑制血清VEGF水平,控制肿瘤进展,且无严重不良反应,安全性高,值得临床推广应用。     

Comparative Analysis of Safety and Efficacy of Transarterial Chemoembolization for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with and without Pre-Existing Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunts

PurposeTo compare the safety and efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with and without transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS).Materials and MethodsThis single-institution study included a retrospective review of 50 patients who underwent transarterial chemoembolization for HCC between January 2010 and April 2017. Twenty-five patients had preexisting TIPS, and 25 patients were selected to control for age, sex, and target tumor size. Baseline median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD; 13 TIPS, 9 control; P < .001) and albumin-bilirubin (ALBI; 3 TIPS, 2 control; P < .001) differed between groups. Safety was assessed on the basis of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) and change in MELD and ALBI grade assessed between 3 and 6 months. Efficacy was assessed by tumor response and time to progression (TTP).ResultsThere was 1 severe adverse event (CTCAE grade >2) in the TIPS group. There was no difference in the change in MELD or ALBI grade. Although there was no difference in tumor response (P = .19), more patients achieved a complete response in the control group (19/25, 76%) than in the TIPS group (13/25, 52%). There was no difference in TTP (P = .82). At 1 year, 2 patients in the control group and 3 patients in the TIPS group received a liver transplant. Seven patients died in the TIPS group.ConclusionsTransarterial chemoembolization is as safe and effective in patients with TIPS as in patients without TIPS, despite worse baseline liver function. Severe adverse events are rare and may be transient.